Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Geriatric assessment in primary care – practicability and implications for care


A- A+
Alt. Display

Poster Abstracts

Geriatric assessment in primary care – practicability and implications for care


Christine Trischak

Competence Center Integrated Care, Vienna Regional Health Insurance Fund, AT
X close



The number of older patients with multiple chronic diseases increases due to sociodemographic developments and, therefore, geriatrics and multimorbidity become a major issue in primary care. In this context, geriatric assessments, which are commonly used in hospital care, are also becoming more important in primary care. Therefore, we composed a respective assessment tool (CCIV-assessment) based on the instruments used in Austrian hospitals and thus building a bridge between primary and hospital care. The CCIV-assessment was then tested regarding its practicability among Austrian general practitioners (GP).


The CCIV-assessment has been composed under the premise of a maximum duration of one hour and potential delegability to other healthcare professionals. Overall, 16 Austrian GP (from 7 federal states) tested the tool by conducting the assessment in 185 patients (10-18/GP; 39% male, Ø82.6 years, Ø8 diagnoses, 9 medications). Then, they answered a quantitative questionnaire pertaining to the practicability of the tool. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics (SPSS 26.0).


In 181 tested patients (98%), the assessment revealed at least one relevant functional deficit (Ø4, max. 8). Level of care and number of functional deficits correlated (Spearman: 0.3, p<0.01). Deficits were mainly found in mobility (55%: Timed Up and Go-Test >20 sec) and activities of daily liv-ing (86% IADL ≤ 15/16 points and 72% Barthel-Index ≤ 95/100 points). The average time to complete and document the functional tests was 34 minutes (min. 14, max. 61, n=121). Use of the electronic (vs. paper) documentation resulted in a significant lower time requirement of 9 minutes. Regarding subsequent interventions, 11 GP suggested 121 interventions in 57/185 patients (30.8%); thereby, pharmacological interventions were preferred.


On the basis of the Austrian Health Care Structure Plan (ÖSG), which suggests usage of a geriatric assessment in primary care, the CCIV-assessment was developed. The tool was designed on the basis of a minimized duration as well as feasibility by different health care professionals without any additional devices. Pertaining to the results our survey, following the practice test, the thus com-posed tool is a practicable one.




We concluded that the CCIV-assessment is a practicable tool for primary care as the required time is manageable. It supports a systematic and objective approach of the functioning of elderly people and reveals individual care needs.

However, uncovering functional deficits per se did not induce adequate interventions (neither in number nor in quality); therefore, medical algorithms are needed that make precise recommendations for subsequent diagnosis and/or treatment/care.

Lessons learned

Multidimensional assessments are manageable in primary care and reveal functional deficits.

Subsequent to the assessment, algorithms are important in order to induce a benefit through interventions.


The survey only included GP not nurses. In this regard, it should, however, be mentioned that primary care is a fairly new field for nurses in Austria and does not yet have the same importance as in Northern European countries.

Suggestions for future research

The CCIV-assessment should be implemented in primary care and there should be an early screening for patients who could benefit from it.


How to Cite: Trischak C. Geriatric assessment in primary care – practicability and implications for care. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2021;21(S1):209. DOI:
Published on 01 Sep 2021.


  • PDF (EN)