Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Case management for at-risk elderly patients in the English integrated care pilots: observat...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Research & theory

Case management for at-risk elderly patients in the English integrated care pilots: observational study of staff and patient experience and secondary care utilisation

Authors:

Martin Roland ,

University of Cambridge, GB
About Martin
Professor of Health Services Research
X close

Richard Lewis,

Ernst and Young LLP, GB
About Richard
Partner, Ernst and Young LLP
X close

Adam Steventon,

Nuffield Trust, GB
About Adam
Senior Research Analyst
X close

Gary Abel,

University of Cambridge, GB
About Gary
Research associate
X close

John Adams,

RAND Corporation, US
About John
Senior statistician
X close

Martin Bardsley,

Nuffield Trust, GB
About Martin
Head of research
X close

Laura Brereton,

RAND Europe, GB
About Laura
Analyst
X close

Xavier Chitnis,

Nuffield Trust, GB
About Xavier
Senior research analyst
X close

Annalijn Conklin,

RAND Europe, GB
About Annalijn
Analyst
X close

Laura Staetsky,

RAND Europe, GB
About Laura
Analyst
X close

Sarah Tunkel,

Ernst and Young LLP, GB
About Sarah
Senior manager
X close

Tom Ling

RAND Europe, GB
About Tom
Director
X close

Abstract

Introduction: In 2009, the English Department of Health appointed 16 integrated care pilots which aimed to provide better integrated care. We report the quantitative results from a multi-method evaluation of six of the demonstration projects which used risk profiling tools to identify older people at risk of emergency hospital admission, combined with intensive case management for people identified as at risk. The interventions focused mainly on delivery system redesign and improved clinical information systems, two key elements of Wagner's Chronic Care Model.

Methods: Questionnaires to staff and patients. Difference-in-differences analysis of secondary care utilisation using data on 3,646 patients and 17,311 matched controls, and changes in overall secondary care utilisation.

Results: Most staff thought that care for their patients had improved. More patients reported having a care plan but they found it significantly harder to see a doctor or nurse of their choice and felt less involved in decisions about their care. Case management interventions were associated with a 9% increase in emergency admissions. We found some evidence of imbalance between cases and controls which could have biased this estimate, but simulations of the possible effect of unobserved confounders showed that it was very unlikely that the sites achieved their goal of reducing emergency admissions. However, we found significant reductions of 21% and 22% in elective admissions and outpatient attendance in the six months following an intervention, and overall inpatient and outpatient costs were significantly reduced by 9% during this period. Area level analyses of whole practice populations suggested that overall outpatient attendances were significantly reduced by 5% two years after the start of the case management schemes.

Conclusion: Case management may result in improvements in some aspects of care and has the potential to reduce secondary care costs. However, to improve patient experience, case management approaches need to be introduced in a way which respects patients' wishes, for example the ability to see a familiar doctor or nurse.

How to Cite: Roland M, Lewis R, Steventon A, Abel G, Adams J, Bardsley M, et al.. Case management for at-risk elderly patients in the English integrated care pilots: observational study of staff and patient experience and secondary care utilisation. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2012;12(5):None. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.850
309
Views
228
Downloads
17
Citations
Published on 27 Jul 2012.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • html (EN)

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus