Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Continuity of care: betrayed values or misplaced nostalgia?


A- A+
Alt. Display

Perspective papers

Continuity of care: betrayed values or misplaced nostalgia?


Martin Roland

University of Cambridge, GB
About Martin
Professor of Health Services Research
X close


Care is better coordinated when doctors have personal responsibility for their patients. Continuity and a sense of personal responsibility are becoming more difficult to provide in hospitals, in part because of the European Working Time Directive. However, in many countries general practitioners are self-employed and able to organise their practices as they wish. In the UK, they increasingly do so in ways that make it difficult for patients to get continuity of care. This is despite most patients being clear that they want to see a regular doctor, and professional bodies in primary care consistently promoting continuity as a core value. General practitioners need to decide whether continuity of care matters. If it does, then they need to take a lead in ensuring that care is organised so that patients who want to see a regular doctor are able to do so. Suggestions are included for how contemporary practice can be organised to promote this traditional but still highly relevant value.

How to Cite: Roland M. Continuity of care: betrayed values or misplaced nostalgia?. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2012;12(8):None. DOI:
Published on 25 Oct 2012.
Peer Reviewed


  • html (EN)

  • PDF (EN)