Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Healthcare Professionals’ Views of the Integrated County Healthcare Consortium in Zhejiang, ...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Research & theory

Healthcare Professionals’ Views of the Integrated County Healthcare Consortium in Zhejiang, China

Authors:

Qisheng Gao,

School of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 311399, CN
X close

Yao Ma,

School of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 311399, CN
X close

Pinghua Zhu,

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, CN
X close

Dingwan Chen

School of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 311399, CN
X close

Abstract

Introduction: The integrated county healthcare consortium (ICHC) is becoming an important measure to improve the capacity of primary-level medical services and to achieve grading diagnosis and treatment system in China. However, it is not clear whether health professionals are satisfied with this reform and what are the problems with it. This study aimed to understand the satisfaction of healthcare professionals to the ICHC in Zhejiang Province, China, and analyze the problems and improvement measures of the ICHC.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the 11 pilot counties (cities and districts) implementing the construction of the ICHC in Zhejiang in November 2019. Healthcare professionals from the leading county-level hospital, three township health centers (THCs) or community health centers (CHCs) in each ICHC were invited to participate in this survey.

Results: A total of 3531 healthcare professionals were included, 85.92% of the participants agreed that the integration of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other professional public health institutions into the construction of ICHC could actively promote basic public health work. The most severe problem was the lack of financial guarantee fund input (severity score: 2.92 ± 1.76). The most crucial measure to promote the construction of the ICHC was to increase government financial input and improve the security mechanism (importance score: 4.81 ± 0.47). The satisfaction of the healthcare professionals to the ICHC was 89.41%. The satisfaction of healthcare professionals from county-level hospitals was 2.37 (95% CI: 1.760–3.238) times higher than that of healthcare professionals from the township health centers (THCs) or community health centers (CHCs). The satisfaction of health professionals with a college degree or below was 3.215 (95%CI: 1.413–6.786) times higher than that of health professionals with a master’s degree or above.

Conclusions: Zhejiang Province has taken adequate measures to promote the construction of the ICHC. However, there are still some problems. Appropriate and effective policies should be implemented to enhance policy coordination and promote competition among ICHCs, as well as to strengthen medical service quality management and improve performance appraisal scheme.

How to Cite: Gao Q, Ma Y, Zhu P, Chen D. Healthcare Professionals’ Views of the Integrated County Healthcare Consortium in Zhejiang, China. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2022;22:25. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5690
42
Views
18
Downloads
  Published on 22 Jun 2022
 Accepted on 02 Jun 2022            Submitted on 06 Jan 2021

Introduction

Since the 1990s, with the acceleration of the aging process of the population and the increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases, countries worldwide have put forward the reform direction of building integrated healthcare services [1, 2]. Previous studies have reported that integrated care could improve the quality of healthcare [3, 4], patient satisfaction [3], and the accessibility of services [5, 6]. Since the implementation of the new healthcare system reform in 2009, China has made admirable progress, including the nearly universal insurance coverage, the strengthening of primary healthcare infrastructure, the equalization of basic public health services, the establishment of the national essential medicine system, and the reform in public hospitals [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. However, China’s healthcare delivery system was fragmented, hospital-centric and treatment-dominated [14, 15, 16]. Hospitals and primary healthcare centers in China have different functions, operate independently and compete for patients [16]. In 2016, the report Deepening health reform in China proposed strengthening health care in China by shaping a tiered healthcare delivery system following a people-centered integrated care model [17, 18]. The medical consortium has been vigorously promoted by the National Health Commission as the primary method for achieving people-centered integrated care [19, 20]. There are currently four types of medical consortium in China: medical groups in urban areas, integrated county healthcare consortium (ICHC), cross-regional specialist alliances, and telemedicine collaboration networks [19]. The ICHC is composed of a leading county-level hospital, several THCs (CHCs), and village clinics. It is a kind of direct management model in which the leading hospital director is the only legal representative. The leading hospital is responsible for the administrative management and business operation of the personnel, finance, and health resources of the THCs (CHCs) [21, 22]. The ICHC has become an important carrier to promote the structural reform of the healthcare supply-side and construct a grading diagnosis and treatment system in rural China. In August 2019, the National Health Commission identified Shanxi Province and Zhejiang Province as pilot provinces for the construction of ICHC, with 567 counties as pilot counties.

The construction of ICHC in Zhejiang Province began in September 2017, when it was decided to carry out pilot work on the construction of ICHC in Deqing County, Dongyang City, Changshan County, Tongxiang City, Keqiao District, Yuyao City, Luqiao District, Chun’an County, Rui’an City, Putuo District, and Jinyun County. 39 county-level hospitals and 170 THCs (CHCs) in the 11 counties (cities and districts) were integrated into 27 ICHCs. By the end of 2019, 70 counties (cities and districts) in Zhejiang formed 208 county-level hospitals and 1,063 THCs (CHCs) into 161 ICHCs, achieving full county coverage of ICHC. The goals of the ICHC are to achieve a community of services, responsibility, interest and management. To achieve these goals, the ICHC in Zhejiang Province has implemented a series of reforms in the management system and operation mechanism. In the management system, almost every county has established an integrated county healthcare consortium management committee, which is generally headed by the county party secretary or governor, with key leaders from the Development and Reform Bureau, the Finance Bureau, the Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, the Health Bureau, and other departments as members. The integrated county healthcare consortium management committee is responsible for major matters such as planning and construction, financial input, personnel arrangement, and assessment and supervision of the ICHC. In the personnel management, medical staffs are recruited, trained, deployed and managed centrally by the ICHC. To encourage doctors from the lead hospital to provide services at the THCs (CHCs), the ICHC usually gives them additional financial subsidies or makes the accumulated service time at the THCs (CHCs) a prerequisite for a title promotion. In terms of financial input, the financial funds allocated by the government to county hospitals and primary healthcare institutions are unified and allocated to the ICHC, which will use them in a coordinated manner, taking into account the nature and purpose of the funds. In terms of health insurance payment methods, the reform of multiple health insurance payment methods under global budget management has been implemented, namely, the inpatient medical service is mainly paid according to the DRGs points method [23], the bed-day payment is gradually implemented for the in-patient medical service of long-term and chronic diseases, and the capitation payment based on the family doctor contract service is implemented for the outpatient medical service [24]. In addition, an incentive and restraint mechanism has been established whereby health insurance savings can be used proportionally by ICHC and reasonable overspending can be shared proportionally between the health insurance administration and ICHC respectively. In order to realize the shift from “treatment-centered” to “health-centered”, Zhejiang Province has made it a key task to strengthen basic public health services and promote the integration of medical and preventive services. The main approach is to select one public health commissioner from the members of the leading group of CDC and one public health liaison from the high-quality professional staffs of CDC, who are then assigned to each to each ICHC simultaneously to supervise and guide public health work. Moreover, public health physicians are encouraged to participate in the family doctor contract services [25]. The prescription for health which was confirmed to be feasible in primary care practice is also regarded as an essential part of clinical medical service [26]. Moreover, the ICHCs in Zhejiang Province have basically realized the unified management of finance, drugs and medical consumables. Zhejiang Province also requires the establishment of medical imaging, electrocardiography, pathology diagnosis and medical testing sharing centers in the county, and ultimately achieve the goal of conducting tests in primary healthcare institutions, county hospitals for diagnosis, and mutual recognition of test results in the county.

The ICHC is a policy-orientated health organization led by the local government [27]. The integration between the leading hospitals and THCs (CHCs) is usually not voluntary, nor is it in response to the healthcare market demands [10]. Previous studies mainly focused on the practice, experience, and short-term performance of ICHC in Zhejiang [28, 29, 30]. In 2010, Chinese current Premier Li Keqiang pointed out that China should give full play to the role of healthcare professionals as the leading force in the healthcare reform. Inspiring healthcare professionals to get involved plays a vital role in the success of healthcare reform [31, 32, 33]. However, there are few reports to evaluate this policy based on the empirical data at the healthcare professional level. This study investigated healthcare professionals’ views and satisfaction with this reform and analyzed the problems and improvement measures of this reform.

Methods

Data Collection

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the 11 pilot counties (cities and districts) in Zhejiang Province in November 2019. The number of THCs (CHCs) included in the ICHC varies from a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 21, with a mean of 7 and a median of 6. The survey units included the leading hospital of each ICHC, as well as one large, one medium and one small THC (CHC) selected using the convenience sampling method. The questionnaire was developed using an online questionnaire website Wenjuanxing (https://www.wjx.cn/).

The questionnaire link was first sent via WeChat (a Chinese multi-purpose instant messaging, social media app developed by Tencent) to the relevant health bureau administrators in the 11 counties (cities and districts), who then sent the link to the relevant staff in each ICHC office, and finally they sent the link to the DingTalk workgroups (an enterprise communication and collaboration platform developed by Alibaba) of the leading hospital and THCs (CHCs) for online responses by healthcare professionals. The principles of voluntariness, confidentiality, and anonymity were respected throughout the study. The formula of the sample size calculation is N=Z2α/2P(1P)/δ2 [34]. According to a previous study, healthcare professionals’ job satisfaction in the ICHC of Guangxi Autonomous region was 91.15% [35]. Since there was no literature on the healthcare professionals’ satisfaction with ICHC so far, we used this job satisfaction as a reference. The minimum sample size was calculated as 124, giving the study a margin of error of ± 5% (confidence interval 95%).

The sample size in this study was much larger than the minimum sample size calculated.

Measurement

The self-designed questionnaire consisted of three parts. The first part included sociodemographic information, including the participants’ sex, age, education degree, region, hospital level, job category, professional title, and personnel types. The second part dealt with health Professionals’ views of ICHC, including the healthcare professions’ evaluations of the construction measures, the importance scores of measures to improve the overall medical service capacity, and the severity of the problems of ICHC. The healthcare professions’ perceptions of the construction measures included seven questions, such as the integration of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other professional public health institutions into the construction of ICHC can actively promote basic public health work, and so on. Each question was scored using a 5-point response scale where 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = somewhat disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = somewhat agree, 5 = strongly agree. The importance scores of measures to improve the overall medical service capacity of ICHC involved eight items, such as increasing government financial input and enhancing the security mechanism, and so on. Each item was scored using a 5-point response scale where 5 = very important, 4 = important, 3 = moderately important, 2 = slightly important, 1 = not important. The severity of problems of the ICHC comprised 12 items, such as insufficient financial input, and so on. Each item was scored using a 6-point response scale where 0 meant that the problem did not exist, five meant the problem was the most serious. The higher the score, the stronger the severity of the problem. The third part was the healthcare professional’s satisfaction on the ICHC, which was evaluated with a single item: “Overall, how satisfied are you with the ICHC?” This item was categorized as 0 (not satisfied) and 1 (satisfied).

Data Analysis

Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentage. Quantitative variables were described as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data were also visualized using heatmap, and forest plot. The binary logistic regression analysis with the stepwise forward method was used to investigate the association between sociodemographic variables and satisfaction. The two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using R 3.6.1 for windows.

Results

Demographic Characteristics

A total of 3531 health professionals participated in the study. The socio-demographic characteristics of participants were presented in Table 1. Among the participants, 924 (26.17%) were from Keqiao District, 2563 (72.59%) were from THCs (CHCs), 2229 (63.13%) were female, 2288 (64.8%) aged less than or equal to 40 years old, 2645 (74.91%) had an undergraduate degree, 1911 (54.12%) were clinicians, 1403 (39.73%) were with junior professional title, 3100 (87.79%) were formal staffs.

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of participants (N = 3,531).


VARIABLES CATEGORIES N (%)

County (City, District) Deqing County 369 (10.45)

Dongyang City 213 (6.03)

Changshan county 237 (6.71)

Tongxiang City 264 (7.48)

Keqiao District 924 (26.17)

Yuyao City 237 (6.71)

Luqiao District 117 (3.31)

Chun’an County 207 (5.86)

Ruian City 345 (9.77)

Putuo District 306 (8.67)

Jinyun County 312 (8.84)

Hospital level Leading county-level hospitals 968 (27.41)

THCs (CHCs) 2563 (72.59)

Sex Male 1302 (36.87)

Female 2229 (63.13)

Age <=40 2288 (64.80)

>=41 1243 (35.20)

Education degree Master or above 60 (1.70)

Undergraduate degree 2645 (74.91)

College degree or below 826 (23.39)

Job Category Clinician 1911 (54.12)

Public health physician 479 (13.57)

Medical technician 653 (18.49)

Administrative personnel 488 (13.82)

Professional title Senior professional title 573 (16.23)

Intermediate professional title 1172 (33.19)

Junior professional title 1403 (39.73)

No professional title 383 (10.85)

Types of personnel Formal staff 3100 (87.79)

Temporary staff 431 (12.21)

Views of ICHC

Healthcare professions’ perceptions of the construction measures of ICHC were showed in Figure 1. Among all the participants, 85.92% agreed (including strongly agree and somewhat agree) that the integration of the CDC and other professional public health institutions into the ICHC could actively promote basic public health work. Only 34.98% agreed that the leading hospital has exacerbated the monopoly of health resources and patients in the county.

The combined percentage of healthcare professions who responded that they strongly agreed and somewhat agreed with the construction measures of ICHC
Figure 1 

The combined percentage of healthcare professions who responded that they strongly agreed and somewhat agreed with the construction measures of ICHC.

The severity scores of the problems of the ICHC were presented in Table 2. The most serious problem as perceived by the healthcare professionals was the lack of financial input from the government. The problem with the lowest severity score was poor two-way referral.

Table 2

The severity scores of the problems of the ICHC.


PROBLEMS SCORE (MEAN ± SD)

The government financial fund input is insufficient. 2.92 ± 1.76

There are not enough health professionals. 2.61 ± 1.68

The medical facilities and equipment are poor. 2.48 ± 1.71

The performance appraisal and benefit distribution are unfair. 2.45 ± 1.74

The construction of information sharing platform is lagging. 2.44 ± 1.72

The integration mechanism of medical and preventive services is not perfect. 2.34 ± 1.66

The management system is imperfect. 2.24 ± 1.69

The operational and management autonomy is weakened. 2.23 ± 1.69

The medical service capacity is not strong. 2.17 ± 1.66

The general practitioner contracting services are not as effective as they could be. 1.99 ± 1.72

The payment method of health insurance is unreasonable. 1.92 ± 1.73

The two-way referral system is not smooth. 1.80 ± 1.68

The importance scores of measures to improve the overall medical service capacity of the ICHC were shown in Figure 2. According to the importance scores, from high to low, they were as follows: increase government financial input and improve the security mechanism (4.81 ± 0.47), formulate incentive policies and introduce medical technical talents (4.66 ± 0.59), adjust the price comparison relationship between different medical service items (4.62 ± 0.61), set up a high-level medical alliance and the provincial hospital provides assistance (4.59 ± 0.69), relax access conditions for medical technology and equipment (4.39 ± 0.83), promote multi-location-practice of doctors (4.22 ± 0.94), remove the restriction on the grading evaluation of the leading hospital (3.98 ± 1.01), cancel the general outpatient service of the tertiary hospital in the city (3.75 ± 1.11).

The importance scores of measures to improve the overall medical service capacity of ICHC
Figure 2 

The importance scores of measures to improve the overall medical service capacity of ICHC.

Satisfaction with ICHC

The satisfaction of healthcare professionals to the ICHC was 89.41%. The binary logistic regression model revealed that the county (city, district), hospital level, sex and education degree were associated with satisfaction (Figure 3). It was found that healthcare professionals from the Ruian city, Chun’an county, Tongxiang city, Keqiao district were 6.203 (95% CI: 3.235–13.149), 2.305 (95% CI: 1.305–4.284), 2.106 (95% CI: 1.215–3.793), 1.531 (95% CI: 1.059–2.197) times more likely to feel satisfied than healthcare professionals from Deqing county, respectively. The satisfaction was 2.37 (95% CI: 1.760–3.238) times more in healthcare professionals from County-level hospitals compared to healthcare professionals from THCs (CHCs). Women’s satisfaction was 1.583 (95% CI: 1.265–1.980) times higher than that of men. Healthcare professionals with a college degree or below and an undergraduate degree were 3.215 (95% CI: 1.413–6.786) and 2.385 (95% CI: 1.084–4.823) times more likely to feel satisfied than those with a master degree or higher, respectively.

The influencing factors of satisfaction of healthcare professionals to ICHC
Figure 3 

The influencing factors of satisfaction of healthcare professionals to ICHC.

Discussion

With the advancement of ICHC in China, more and more studies have been conducted in this area, but most of them are qualitative studies. In this study, we analyzed healthcare professionals’ views of policies related to the ICHC and overall satisfaction through a cross-sectional questionnaire.

Integration of Medical Services and Preventive Services

This study showed that nearly 86% of the respondents agreed that the integration of public health institutions into the ICHC can improve the capacity of basic public health services. Surplus of the health insurance fund can be used for employee bonuses, leading hospitals to place more emphasis than before on public health and preventive services to reduce disease incidence and save on medical costs [19]. A recent study revealed that medical staffs were highly satisfied with the integration of medical and preventive services, but there was room for improvement in the interconnection of information systems and data sharing between ICHCs and public health institutions [36].

Impact of Health Insurance Payment Methods on Health Care Services

Although Zhejiang Province has implemented a variety of different health insurance payment methods for outpatient and inpatient services respectively, 56.7% still agreed that the implementation of global budget management could result in underutilization of medical services. The global budget can effectively curb the growth of insurance fund expenditures and regulate the use of drugs and high-value consumables [37]. However, many studies showed that the implementation of the global budget could not improve quality [37, 38]. Furthermore, the cost containment may produce responsibility-shifting behaviors, such as undertreatment of admitted patients, reduction in the number of admissions, prevarication of critically ill patients and those with high medical costs [39].

Similar to the point-of-service (POS) [40], ICHCs allow patients within their jurisdiction to travel outside the county or to other ICHCs for medical treatment. However, the medical expenses incurred by patients are still paid by the ICHC following the health insurance policy. Some researchers are concerned that ICHC may restrict patients’ freedom to seek medical treatment to save the health insurance funds [41], and that ICHCs may induce demand for patients from outside their jurisdictions [42]. However, this study showed that only a small proportion of people agreed that there was unreasonable competition for patients and health insurance funds between different ICHCs, which may be related to some factors such as the implementation of clinical pathways, the creation of health insurance management positions, the implementation of cross-checking and settlement of health insurance funds between ICHCs, and the health professionals tend not to admit restricting patients or inducing demand themselves.

Government Financial Assistance

Government-subsidized income generally accounts for no more than 10% of the total income of county-level public hospitals [16, 43]. The primary healthcare institutions are mainly subsidized by the government [16]. This study indicated that the most serious problem reported by healthcare professionals was inadequate financial input and increasing financial input was considered the most important improvement measure. This may be due to the fact that, on the one hand, some township governments will no longer allocate funds to primary healthcare institutions when they join the ICHC [30], and on the other hand, although county-level hospitals are non-profit hospitals for the public good, they have long been under-invested by the government, and in the face of the uncertainty of the construction of ICHC, county-level hospitals hope to reduce operational risks by increasing financial resources.

Quantity, Quality and Mobility of Health Professionals

This study revealed that the lack of health professionals was a significant barrier to ICHC. Previous studies also found that lack of primary care practitioners (PCPs), low educational background of PCPs and lack of respect for PCPs were the critical factors affecting the primary medical service ability and gatekeeping role [16, 44, 45, 46]. The China Health Statistics Yearbook 2021 shows that in 2020, the number of licensed (assistant) doctors and registered nurses in primary healthcare institutions accounted for 29.3% and 22.5% of the total, respectively. Among the licensed (assistant) doctors in THCs (CHCs), only 27.2% and 4.0% have bachelor’s degrees and senior titles, respectively. In 2018, the number of general practitioners per 10,000 population in China was 2.22, significantly lower than that of countries such as Canada and Australia [47]. Although ICHCs have issued policies to promote the mobility of healthcare professionals, mainly from county-level hospitals to primary healthcare institutions or from primary healthcare institutions to the same level, there are still many restrictions on the flow of health professionals from primary healthcare institutions to county-level hospitals.

Establish Urban Medical Alliance with Provincial Hospitals

In China, county-level hospitals mainly provide diagnosis and treatment services for common and frequent-incidence diseases in the county. There is a big gap between county-level hospitals and urban tertiary hospitals in terms of medical service capacity [48]. When county-level hospitals assist primary healthcare institutions, their medical capacity will be weakened. Therefore, in this study, healthcare professionals considered the establishment of a higher level of medical alliance with the help of provincial hospitals as one of the effective improvement measures. In Zhejiang, the cooperation between urban tertiary hospitals and county-level hospitals is a mutually beneficial win-win cooperation model, whereby urban tertiary hospitals send clinical medical experts or managers to county-level hospitals to help them improve their medical ability and management level, and in return, urban tertiary hospitals can not only get financial rewards from the provincial government, but county-level hospitals are usually required to pay a certain percentage (e.g. 3%) of the current year’s revenue to urban tertiary hospitals. One study showed that with the help of urban tertiary hospitals, county-level hospitals improved their management and service capacity and business volume, and also developed new medical technologies. However, county-level hospitals are under tremendous financial pressure [49].

Performance Appraisal and Benefit Distribution

Although more than 80% of the respondents agreed that the ICHC had become a community of interests, achieving full integration of ICHC remains a challenge if the status of the financial budgets of the healthcare professionals in county-level hospitals and primary healthcare institutions cannot be unified, or if primary healthcare professionals cannot participate fairly in the distribution of benefits. As revealed by this study, the problem of unfair performance evaluation was relatively severe. Other studies reported that there are many problems in the performance appraisal of primary healthcare institutions, such as egalitarianism in public health appraisal, the results of appraisal are not linked to financial subsidies, and the appraisal method does not fully rely on information systems [46, 50, 51]. In addition, how to promote the equitable distribution of benefits between the staffs of leading hospitals and primary healthcare institutions, between formal and temporary staffs, and between those engaged in medical services and those engaged in public work is one of the important tasks to be addressed by the ICHC.

Adjustment of Medical Service Prices

Public county-level hospitals and primary healthcare institutions in China have all implemented the zero-markup policy for essential drugs [52]. However, studies showed that the proportion of medical examination and medical consumables income in total medical income increased by substitution, and the proportion of income reflecting the value of medical staffs’ labor and skills remains relatively low [52, 53, 54]. Therefore, the healthcare professionals in this study agreed that medical service price should be adjusted. Currently, Zhejiang province is actively promoting the dynamic adjustment of medical service prices and gradually increasing the proportion of income from medical technical services by regulating the practice of diagnosis and treatment, strictly controlling the costs of unreasonable medical examinations and laboratory tests.

Satisfaction and its Influenceing Factors

One study conducted in the Qinghai Province reported that 68.2% of the health professionals in ICHC had job burnout symptoms [55]. Wang et al. [56] revealed that about 14.06% of the primary healthcare professionals in rural China had high turnover intention. A systematic review found that after the healthcare reform in 2009, the job satisfaction of urban community health professionals in China was in the middle level [57]. However, this study showed that health professionals’ satisfaction with ICHC was close to 90%, which may be overestimated to some extent since the county-level health administrators distributed the questionnaire. Besides, we learned in the field interview that primary healthcare providers did not welcome the ICHC so much, especially the directors of THCs, because they were no longer legal representatives and did not have the power of management. As this study showed, the satisfaction of primary healthcare staffs was lower than that of health professionals in county-level hospitals. Some studies reported that primary healthcare providers with higher education are more likely to quit their jobs [58, 59], and income was their most dissatisfied aspect [57, 60]. In addition, non-financial incentives especially career development opportunities are also important for primary healthcare professionals [61], who still have few opportunities to transfer to the county-level hospitals in the ICHC, which may also contribute to their dissatisfaction. This study showed that health professionals with a master’s degree or higher were less satisfied with the ICHC, which may be related to the fact that highly educated health professionals are more likely to find higher paying jobs in high level hospitals in urban areas.

Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research

Several limitations should be taken into account when interpreting the results of this study. First, because the county health bureau is the administrative department of the ICHC, the questionnaire link was sent through the administrative staff of the county health bureau, and although it was stated in the questionnaire’s preamble that the survey was anonymous and that the data were for research purposes only, health professionals may still feel some pressure from their superiors to give a positive evaluation. Second, because of the convenience sampling method and online questionnaire used in this study, the health professionals who participated in the survey may have been supporters of ICHC, leading some selection bias and overestimation of satisfaction. Third, the vast majority of the leading hospitals were county-level people’s hospitals, and this study focused on comparing the difference in the views of health professionals in leading hospitals and THCs (CHCs), without analyzing the cases where the leading hospitals were other types of hospitals (e.g., traditional Chinese medicine hospital). Fourth, the purpose of this study was to discover the general attitudes and perceptions of health professionals towards the construction of the ICHC from the perspective of a large sample of data, and in future studies we will use qualitative research methods such as grounded theory, to analyze in depth the reasons behind a specific issue.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Zhejiang Province has taken adequate measures to promote the construction of ICHC in terms of health insurance payment reform and public health service system. The satisfaction of health professionals with the ICHC was relatively high. At present, the ICHC has not been in operation for a long time, and there are still some problems, such as insufficient financial investment, lack of health professionals and unfair performance appraisal. Further measures are needed in the future to promote the synergy of health insurance, financial, personnel and price policies, to promote competition among different ICHCs, to establish an internal market, to strengthen medical service quality management, and to improve performance appraisal scheme.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all the people who assisted in the investigation. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Soft Science Research Program of Zhejiang Province.

Funding Information

This study was supported by the Soft Science Research Program of Zhejiang Province (Grant Number: 2019C35023, 2018C35022).

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Reviewers

Linlin Hu Ph.D., Associate Professor, School of Health Policy and Management, Peking Union Medical College, China.

Carlos Sanchez-Piedra, Health Technology Assessment Agency of Carlos III Institute of Health (AETS), Madrid, Spain.

References

  1. Gröne O, Garcia-Barbero M, WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services. Integrated care: a position paper of the WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2001; 1: e21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.28 

  2. Enthoven AC, Tollen LA. Competition in health care: it takes systems to pursue quality and efficiency. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2005; Suppl Web Exclusives: W5–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.w5.420 

  3. Nolte E, Pitchforth E. What is the evidence on the economic impact of integrated care? Technical Report. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization; 2014 [cited 2021 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/251434/What-is-the-evidence-on-the-economic-impacts-of-integrated-care.pdf. 

  4. Ouwens M, Wollersheim H, Hermens R, Hulscher M, Grol R. Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews. Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care. 2005; 17(2): 141–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi016 

  5. Shaw S, Rosen R, Rumbold B. What is integrated care? An overview of integrated care in NHS. Nuffield Trust; 2011[cited 2021 Jan 6]. Available from:http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2017-01/what-is-integrated-care-report-web-final.pdf. 

  6. Dudley L, Garner P. Strategies for integrating primary health services in low-and middle-income countries at the point of delivery. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011; (7): CD003318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003318.pub3 

  7. Lin W, Liu GG, Chen G. The urban resident basic medical insurance: a landmark reform towards universal coverage in China. Health Economics. 2009; 18(Suppl 2): S83–S96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1500 

  8. Guan X, Liang H, Xue Y, Shi L. An analysis of China’s national essential medicines policy. Journal of Public Health Policy. 2011; 32(3): 305–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2011.34 

  9. Wang H, Gusmano MK, Cao Q. An evaluation of the policy on community health organizations in China: will the priority of new healthcare reform in China be a success? Health Policy. 2011; 99(1): 37–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.07.003 

  10. Yip WC, Hsiao WC, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. The Lancet. 2012; 379(9818): 833–842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61880-1 

  11. Li L. The challenges of healthcare reforms in China. Public Health. 2011; 125(1): 6–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2010.10.010 

  12. Hu S. Essential medicine policy in China: pros and cons. Journal of Medical Economics. 2013; 16(2): 289–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2012.751176 

  13. Marten R, McIntyre D, Travassos C, Shishkin S, Longde W, Reddy S, Vega J. An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). The Lancet. 2014; 384(9960): 2164–2171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60075-1 

  14. Meng Q, Mills A, Wang L, Han Q. What can we learn from China’s health system reform? BMJ. 2019; 365: l2349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2349 

  15. Zhang L, Cheng G, Song S, Yuan B, Zhu W, He L, Ma X, Meng Q. Efficiency performance of China’s health care delivery system. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2017; 32(3): 254–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2425 

  16. Yip W, Hsiao W. Harnessing the privatisation of China’s fragmented health-care delivery. The Lancet. 2014; 384(9945): 805–818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61120-X 

  17. World Bank Group, World Health Organization, Ministry of Finance, National Health and Family Planning Commission and Ministry of Health Resources and Social Security. Deeping health reform in China: building high-quality and value-based service delivery; 2016 [cited 2022 Jan 9]. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/24720. 

  18. Wang X, Sun X, Birch S, Gong F, Valentijn P, Chen L, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Yang H. People-centred integrated care in urban China. Bull World Health Organ. 2018; 96(12): 843–852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.214908 

  19. Wang X, Sun X, Gong F, Huang Y, Chen L, Zhang Y, Birch S. The Luohu model: A template for integrated urban healthcare systems in China. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2018; 18(4): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3955 

  20. Cai M, Liu E, Tao H, Qian Z, Fu QJ, Lin X, Wang M, Xu C, Ni Z. Does a medical consortium influence health outcomes of hospitalized Cancer patients? An integrated care model in Shanxi, China. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2018; 18(2): 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3588 

  21. Xu J, Pan R, Pong RW, Miao Y, Qian D. Different models of hospital–community health centre collaboration in selected cities in China: a cross-sectional comparative study. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2016; 16(1): 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2456 

  22. Yip W, Fu H, Chen AT, Zhai T, Jian W, Xu R, Pan J, Hu M, Zhou Z, Chen Q, Mao W, Sun Q, Chen W. 10 years of health-care reform in China: progress and gaps in universal health coverage. The Lancet. 2019; 394(10204): 1192–1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32136-1 

  23. Healthcare Security Administration of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial Department of Finance, Health Commission of Zhejiang Province. Interim Measures for Payment of DRGs Points for Inpatient Costs of Basic Medical Insurance in Zhejiang Province; 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 5]. Available from: http://ybj.zj.gov.cn/art/2019/11/21/art_1615796_40422468.html. 

  24. Healthcare Security Administration of Zhejiang Province, Health Commission of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial Department of Finance, Zhejiang Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security, Zhejiang Medical Products Administration. Guidance on promoting the reform of the payment mode of basic medical insurance in the integrated county healthcare consortium of the whole province; 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 6]. Available from: http://ybj.zj.gov.cn/art/2019/7/18/art_1615796_35819371.html. 

  25. Health Commission of Zhejiang Province. Guidance on strengthening the public health work of the integrated county healthcare consortium; 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 6]. Available from: http://wsjkw.zj.gov.cn/art/2019/6/18/art_1229123408_857097.html. 

  26. Cifuentes M, Fernald DH, Green LA, Niebauer LJ, Crabtree BF, Stange KC, Hassmiller SB. Prescription for health: changing primary care practice to foster healthy behaviors. Annals of Family Medicine. 2005; 3(Suppl 2): S4–S11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.378 

  27. Zhu L, Peng Z, Liu L, Ling S. Combining Resource, Structure and Institutional Environment: A Configurational Approach to the Mode Selection of the Integrated Healthcare in County. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(16): 2975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162975 

  28. Chen LN, Ge MH, Lin JH, Yu BF. Construction of county medical community: Experience sharing of keqiao district in Shaoxing. Chinses Hospitals. 2019; 023(007): 75–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2019.07.24 [in Chinese]. 

  29. Zhu ZG. The practice and preliminary effect of improving the capacity of primary medical and health services under the background of integrated county healthcare consortium in Deqing County. Chinese Journal of Rural Medicine and Pharmacy. 2020; 27(01): 58–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5180.2020.01.037 [in Chinese]. 

  30. Zhang Y, Shi YF, Shi HH, Shao DC. Merits and demerits of medical community: reflection on practice in Yuyao. Chinese Rural Health Service. 2020; 40(02): 109–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-5916.2020.02.010 [in Chinese]. 

  31. Relman AS. Doctors as the key to health care reform. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2009; 361(13): 1225–1227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0907925 

  32. Rigoli F, Dussault G. The interface between health sector reform and human resources in health. Hum Resour Health. 2003; 1(1): 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-1-9 

  33. Buchan J. Health sector reform and human resources: lessons from the United Kingdom. Health Policy Plan. 2000; 15(3): 319–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/15.3.319 

  34. Kramer MS. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 1st ed.; Berlin, Germany: Springer. 1988; Volume 157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61372-2 

  35. Luo GS, Feng QM, Xu TT, Gao HD, Tan XJ, Zhao JM. Study on satisfaction and policy cognition of health professionals in the integrated county healthcare consortium in poverty-stricken areas of Guangxi. Chongqing Medicine. 2019; 48(04): 676–680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2019.04.031 [in Chinese]. 

  36. Zhou C, Lai SH, Zhang L, Tan F. Analysis on the operation mode and effect of medical preventive integration in county scale medical alliances in Hangzhou. Chin J Hosp Admin. 2021; 37(9): 709–712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn111325-20210311-00210 [in Chinese]. 

  37. He R, Miao Y, Ye T, Zhang Y, Tang W, Li Z, Zhang L. The effects of global budget on cost control and readmission in rural China: a difference-in-difference analysis. Journal of Medical Economics. 2017; 20(9): 903–910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2017.1336448 

  38. Di Giorgio L, Filippini M, Masiero G. Implications of global budget payment system on nursing home costs. Health Policy. 2014; 115(2–3): 237–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.01.017 

  39. Aas IH. Incentives and financing methods. Health Policy. 1995; 34(3): 205–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(95)00759-8 

  40. Forrest CB, Weiner JP, Fowles J, Vogeli C, Frick KD, Lemke KW, Starfield B. Self-referral in point-of-service health plans. JAMA. 2001; 285(17): 2223–2231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.17.2223 

  41. Xu YC. Why the primary medical and health institutions do not welcome the medical community. Physician online. 2019; 7: 13–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-7165.2019.07.007 [in Chinese]. 

  42. Niu YD, Zhang L. Analysis in the development and problems of county medical Alliance. Chinese Health Economics. 2020; 39(2): 22–25 [in Chinese]. 

  43. Xu CH, Yang JX. An empirical analysis of the influence of financial subsidy level on the output of county-level public hospitals. Health Economics Research. 2017; 5: 36–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.20170427.008 [in Chinese]. 

  44. Gao QS. Influencing factors of community first visit system based on fishbone diagram in China. Chinese Journal of General Practice. 2015; 13(3): 341–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2015.03.001 [in Chinese]. 

  45. Wu D, Lam TP. Underuse of Primary Care in China: The Scale, Causes, and Solutions. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2016; 29(2): 240–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150159 

  46. Li X, Lu J, Hu S, Cheng KK, De Maeseneer J, Meng Q, Mossialos E, Xu DR, Yip W, Zhang H, Krumholz HM, Jiang L, Hu S. The primary health-care system in China. The Lancet. 2017; 390(10112): 2584–2594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4 

  47. OECD.Stat. Health care resources: Physicians by categories; 2020[cited 2021 Jan 6]. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=30173. 

  48. Wu JY, Yang QS. Research on the capacity service status quo and evaluation of county public hospital in Zhejiang Province. Chinese Hospitals. 2016; 20(02): 8–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-0592.2016.02.003 [in Chinese]. 

  49. Wei YX, Wang ZY. Analysis and Reflection on the Effect of Close Medical Alliance Trusteeship Cooperation in Zhejiang Province—Based on Incomplete Contract Theory. Health Economics Research. 2020; 37(09): 16–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.2020.09.004 [in Chinese]. 

  50. Yu SQ. Discussion on performance appraisal scheme of primary health institutions under county healthcare consortium. Money China. 2021; 14: 177–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19887/j.cnki.cn11-4098/f.2021.14.088 [in Chinese]. 

  51. Qin JM, Wang F, Lin CM, Zhang YC, Zhang LF. Recent developments in performance assessment policies and practices in primary healthcare in China. Chinese General Practice. 2021; 24(16): 1989–1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.194 [in Chinese]. 

  52. Liu WY, Hsu CH, Liu TJ, Chen PE, Zheng B, Chen CW, Tung TH. Systematic Review of the Effect of a Zero-Markup Policy for Essential Drugs on Healthcare Costs and Utilization in China, 2015–2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8: 618046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.618046 

  53. Zhang TL, Wei RM, Xu LZ, Zhang DF, Li ZR, Zhang H. Impact analysis of medicine markups abolition on revenue structure of 12 public hospitals in Qingdao. Chin J Hosp Admin. 2018; 34(08): 631–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6672.2018.08.004 [in Chinese]. 

  54. Zhai XM, He XM, Du Q, Yuan J, Liu K, Song MY, Cong JN, Huang XM. Research on the impact of comprehensive reform of county public hospitals on the structure of hospital revenue and expenditure. Chinese Hospital Management. 2019; 39(01): 22–24 [in Chinese]. 

  55. Liu Y, Lu L, Wang WX, Liu S, Chen HR, Gao X, Huang MY, Liu YN, Ren YM, Wang CC. Job Burnout and Occupational Stressors among Chinese Healthcare Professionals at County-Level Health Alliances. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(6): 1848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061848 

  56. Wang H, Jin Y, Wang D, Zhao S, Sang X, Yuan B. Job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intention among primary care providers in rural China: results from structural equation modeling. BMC Family Practice. 2020; 21(1): 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-1083-8 

  57. Zhang M, Yang R, Wang W, Gillespie J, Clarke S, Yan F. Job satisfaction of urban community health workers after the 2009 healthcare reform in China: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016; 28(1): 14–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzv111 

  58. Song K. Study on turnover intention and job preference of primary health workers in five provinces of China. PhD thesis, Shandong University. 2014; 63–64 [in Chinese]. 

  59. Yao WG, Wei GW, Xu AG, Qiu LY, Chen Z, Yu H. Sample survey of human resources and work situation of community health services in Guangdong province. Chinese General Practice. 2011; 14(16): 1779–1781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2011.16.009 [in Chinese]. 

  60. Shi L, Song K, Rane S, Sun X, Li H, Meng Q. Factors associated with job satisfaction by Chinese primary care providers. Primary Health Care Research and Development. 2014; 15(1): 46–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423612000692 

  61. Ma X, Wang H, Yang L, Shi L, Liu X. Realigning the incentive system for China’s primary healthcare providers. BMJ. 2019; 365: l2406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2406